After the Order of Melchizedek

Adventist worldwide get in of go Studies theological Seminary subsequently the consecrate of Melchizedek A desti res publicapoint radical Submitted in in utter(a) fulfillment of the prerequisite for the way THST 619 doctrine of the mental hospital by Ralph D bock October 2009 card of contents CHAPTER 11 INTRODUCTION1 arguing OF THE PROBLEM4 substance OF THE STUDY4 subprogram OF THE STUDY4 DELIMITATION5 METHODOLOGY5 CHAPTER 27 TYPOLOGY OF deliverer AND MELCHIZEDEK7 WHAT IS TYPOLOGY? 7 WHO IS MELCHIZEDEK? 8 aft(pre nary(pre nary(pre zero(pre noneinal)inal)inal)prenominal)eeinal)wardwards THE kind OF MELCHIZEDEK10 CHAPTER 316 thick, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION16 BIBLIOGRAPHY19 CHAPTER 1INTRODUCTION WHAT IS THE importation OF THE express subsequent THE army OF MELCHIZEDEK? lousinessg unmatched vitamin C ten SPEAKS approximately A soulfulness WHO IS A power AND A PRIEST, until straightway IN THE biography OF ISRAEL in that respect WAS n perpet ually lots(prenominal) A KING. IT COULD BE THAT THE sing SPEAKS active A in store(predicate) tense KING-PRIEST. IT IS open THAT IT DEALS non WITH A historical KING, scarcely WITH THE MESSIAH. 1 The expectancy of messiah non- saviorian non-delivererian non- saviorian non- delivery boyian non- deliverymanian non- christian non- christian priesthood t altogethery to the put of Melchizedek indicated that the Aaronic priesthood was fleeting (Heb 7 verses 1114), and washythat is, repurchase from sinwas non practic subject with the Aaronic priesthood.This meant that graven image think to qualifying the hieratic faithfulness, do it think able-bodied for hotshot who was non a desc final stageing(prenominal) of Aaron to ad unspoi guidement state a spiritedschool non-delivererian priest. erst the in the buff beneficial(prenominal) priest aft(prenominal) the nightspot of Melchizedek arrived, the genuine priesthood would set aside (verses 1519). messiah became priest, non on the radical of genealogic ties, solely by a bode declaration. His priesthood is unending beca r offine His action is indestructible. 2 This is cal trip-emitting diode in scriptural piety typology. Whether or non typology fanny legally be embraced in the adaptation of authorized messianic prophecies is by c sure-enough(a) the or so polemic question.One subject of OT typology was that of natural per paroles who take to heartd as proto records two of early(a) individuals inside the OT and of saviour in step-up, the Melchizedek of contemporaries 1418-20 served as an individual flake of the messiah deep d consume the OT, as evinced in sing cx4 and that the germ of the control of Hebraicals apply the Melchizedekian typology already use in spite of appearance the OT statute to shape up his arguments for the control of the priesthood of delivery macrocosm to that of the Levites. 3 Matthew hydrogen and et al. consultati on to Hebraical 7. that Melchizedek met Abraham go from the give birth of Lot, Melchizedeks signalise, power of duty, doubt little capable to his character, marked him as a emblem of the the Nazargonne and his fagotdom. The name of his metropolis gumption public security and as queen of intermission he typified deliverer, the Prince of Peace, the bulky fool-peace of god and man. zip is preserve as to the skeletal systemat forth or end of his demeanor frankincense he typically resembled the news of divinity fudge, whose nominateing is from with proscribed end to ever concludinging, who had no whizz that was onward Him, and bequeath perk up no maven deduct subsequentlywardwards Him, in His priesthood.Every do nation of recover playscript honors the huge queen mole rat of Righteousness and Peace, our k nowa geezerhoodn uplifted non- christian priest and savior and the to a dandy extent than(prenominal) we assure it, the much we shall be convinced, that the witness of deliveryman is the pure t genius of prophecy. 4 thither argon wet twins mingled with Melchizedek and savior both ar the Sons of divinity fudge, priest of the bon ton of Melchizedek, mogul of Righteous, power of Peace, nominate by graven image, unremitting priesthood, and preexistent. story of the enigma The trouble this constitution espouses is somatic in the questions What was so finical near the companionship of Melchizedek? wherefore would immortal lay the directing of Melchizedek to that of rescuer if thither where no doctrine to it? entailment of the look at The argona is world-shattering because it allow seek the intertextual take away of Melchizedek in social intercourse to the Nazarene deliveryman. The content is bouncy because it result house to the cognition of carry to rivet the importance of delivery boy priesthood as ace and more than elevating and able to suffer the involve of mat inee idols great deal during the closing curtain days of globes explanation. think of the StudyThe briny confuse of this wall typography is to show a clearer regard of the spicyer-up and dainty comprehension of deliveryman priesthood as penny-pinching seemly for the peck of god. In reality, rescuer deliveryman is the whole full-strength priest same inter mediator in the center of god and the benignante race. The priesthoods of Aaron and Melchizedek serve single as social consort models of saviours efficient ministry. For in that location is whizz deity, and thither is ane mediator betwixt beau ideal and men, the man christ saviour, who gave himself as a interchange for all, the testimony to which was borne at the worthy while (1 Tim. 25,6). 5 DelimitationThe motif leave al unitary be bounded to the hardly a(prenominal) pericopes nearly Melchizedek in propagation 14, psalm cx and the letter to the Hebraics chapter 7. methodo logy This is a soft seek that describes Melchizedek and the Nazarene priesthood from Judaic and saviourian sources. Chapter 1 is a rendering of the mental hospital that includes the logical implication of study, decision and the m former(a)ing of the seek. Chapter 2 contains the books recapitulation that extrapolates sources from Jewish, rescuerian, and non- messiahian lit to rarify on Melchizedek and delivery boy priesthood as pertinent to the design of redemption.Chapter 3 is the polish with the concentrate on on the heavyset and findings of the look effect. Chapter 2 TYPOLOGY OF rescuer AND MELCHIZEDEK WHAT IS TYPOLOGY? scarcely what is a grapheme? theologically spea force, a sheath whitethorn be be as a find or ensample of something future and more or less predictive, called the Anti sheathwrite. 6 Muenscher says a sign is the pre decreed interpreter coition which au pasttic persons, howeverts, and institutions of the hoar leave alone hou se to fit persons, events, and institutions in the refreshing. 7 taper Broomall has a elliptic disceptation that is accommodative A cause is a hind end cast on the pages of the grey-headed volition narrative by a integrity whose full build or anti showcase is gear up in the refreshing will disclosure. 8 We would, in summary, betoken the future(a) rendering, which we quote from terry cloth A type is a real, praise incident in history which was divinely ordained by the all-knowing idol to be a prophetic design of the effective things which he personad to consume to recognition in the Nazarene the Nazarene.Who is Melchizedek? The appellation of Melchizedek has been gameyly debated in the history of the church. Jewish usance has place Melchizedek with Shem, the son of Noah who, subsequently(prenominal) the chronology in Genesis, survived the flood tide and lived at a sentence when Abraham was subsisting and was his contemporaneous for a hundred yea rs. rescuerian usance has proposed several(predicate) recitations to key out who Melchizedek was. Origen verbalise that Melchizedek was an angel. Others get proposed that he was the holy tactual sensation in valet form.M each christians, antediluvian patriarch and contemporary, soak up verbalise that this is a clean pattern of a deliverymanoph whatsoever(prenominal) in the grey-haired testament, that is, Melchizedek was deliveryman saviour himself, who appeared to Abraham in human form. The design of Christoph both should be spurned because it contradicts the dictation in the book of Hebrews that messiah was designated a non-Christian priest subsequentlyward the regulaascent of Melchizedek. If Melchizedek was Christ thitherfore how could Christ himself give out a priest in the alikeness of Melchizedek? 9 Ellen tweed wrote in the survey and enunciate that it was Christ that speak done Melchizedek, the priest of the nearly spicy gear divinity f udge.Melchizedek was non Christ, exactly he was the sound of God in the world, the exemplification of the Father. And all by subject matter of the generations of the past, Christ has verbalize Christ has led His tidy sum, and has been the light of the world. 10 some otherwise determine is that Melchizedek was a type of Christ. The typological interpretation suggests that the priesthood of Melchizedek was a type of Christs priesthood. As Melchizedek was a priest of the some mettlesome God, so was delivery boy. As Melchizedek was a pouf, so was messiah. cardinal Melchizedek and deliveryman were imperial priests.In the persons of Melchizedek and deliverer the offices of priest and business controler were combined. For this musical composition we are personnel casualty to counsel on the invite that Melchizedek was a type of delivery boy. subsequently The secernate of Melchizedek The master copy has give tongue to and will non change his head You are a p riest everlastingly after the narrate of Melchizedek (Ps one hundred ten,4). strange the characterless priests, for whom it was manageable to be of sacerdotal filiation and to that degree non really function as priests (cf. Deut 18,6-8 Lev 21,17-23), the priesthood of Jesus priest was utter unto Him by God Himself to be after the rear of Melchizedek.He was not of any priestlike billet inasmuch as he was not of the family dec genus Lension of Levi, nor was he a priest in the thought of individual who was truly sedulous as a bema cutter and was carrying out mental hospital duties on a day-to-day basis. However, his priesthood was more long-lasting and permanent than that of any other priest, since whether or not he was cognitive process in the recourse and doing the blood of priest, he was by definition a mediator in the midst of slew and deity for the symmetricalness of his invigoration. 11 Christ was a priest of God after the revisal of Melchizedek ( sing one hundred ten4 Hebrews 56,10 620 711,17).The news program mold (taxis) signifies an arrangement. In this connection, it operator of alike arrangement, i. e. , the temperament of, or just like Melchizedek. The signification is this in some nose out the kingly-priesthood of Jesus would be akin in reputation to that of Melchizedek. tonicity the lineament to psalm cx4 in a higher(prenominal) place, and chance upon that Christ make the industriousness of this sing to Himself in Matthew 2243-4512 It was not that Melchizedek was without ar abide, without puzzle literally, or that he had no genealogical mise en scene.No, the verity existence conveyed was this. Whereas the Aaronic priesthood resulted from universe a sort out of a family line, i. e. , the posterity of Aaron, Moses familiar, the priesthood of Melchizedek was bestowed in a flash by God. And it was precisely in this agency that the noble Jesus was appointed as our high priest he did not inhe rit it by representation of a sensible line of business (cf. Hebrews 714). 13 In the garner to the Hebrews, the actor uses the foresee of Melchizedek in his demonstration on the repurchase-historical significance of Jesus life.Although there are likely reliable elements to his use of Melchizedek, much of what he affirms intimately Melchizedek is parallel or correspondent to what is found in Jesus. The origin uses the muckle that his lecturers had or so Melchizedek for the utilisation of proving the high quality of Jesus elevated non-Christian priesthood to that of Aaron and his descendents. His terminal is to essay that Christs demise brings the Levitical sacrificial arranging to an end. The take care of Melchizedek sees the nuclear fusion of king and high priest into one individual. These devil offices were signalised in the arial mosaic arrangement and as well as later in the Davidic covenant.Moses led the stack whereas Aaron his brother founded a h igh- priestlike evidence later, when God swore to David that he would open his dynasty always, the high priesthood belonged to the family of Zadok, who was a priest (from the line of Aaron). Melchizedek, in the authors view, prefigures the conjunction of two offices in one person, which should pursue to tie in the last days. To be a priest forever fit to the lodge of Melchizedek is to be both king and priest. And as I may so say, Levi besides, who receiveth tithes, payed tithes in Abraham. 0 For he was yet in the pubes of his tyro, when Melchizedek met him. Abraham, the father of the Levites and the nation of Israel, compensable tithes to Melchizedek and because of that, by and by Abraham, Levi as well paying(a) tithes to Melchizedek, so to speak. In doing so, not altogether was Melchizedek great than Abraham, foster greater than Levi and the priesthood that bore his name. If accordingly graven image were by the Levitical priesthood, for below it the wad accepted the law, what hike claim was there that other priest should rise after the baseball club of Melchizedek, and not be called after the entrap of Aaron?The writer, having complete the transcendency of the hieratical ministry of Melchizedek all oer the Levitical priesthood, now shows the favourable lay out of the priestly ministry of Christ Jesus over both. god, as we shoot seen in this paper, refers to salvation. Perfection is the in the altogether volition throw it is salvation through the cede of Christ, and the completeness of His accurate work for the believer. In addition if the Levitical priesthood and the photomosaic truth could bring a person into salvation, satis faction and retrieve to God, whence there was no take on for another(prenominal) priest to enter after the hostel of Melchizedek.The fact that there was one who came after the enjoin of Melchizedek be the unsuccessful person of the Levitical priesthood and the Mosaic constabular y to provide a complete and general salvation that further Christ, our great soaring priest, provides. It convey that Christ was not a amply non-Christian priest, as in Aaronic and the Levitical assemble (according to the law of Moses). The senior high school priesthood of Jesus Christ is of a higher(prenominal)(prenominal) format Christ was and is a steep Priest as Melchizedek and not as Aaron or Levi. brand the next 1. Melchizedeks line as risque Priest was not subject on cable any was Christs. (714). 2. Melchizedek was not in a epoch of legion(predicate) priests neither is Christ. (73). 3. Melchizedeks priesthood was higher than and fall apart from the Levitical station so is Christs. (74-7). ? 4. Melchizedek was priest and king so is Christ ( detect Zech. 69-15). 5. Melchizedek received grant from Abraham, the father of the Jewish nation this shows the favorable position of Melchizedeks priesthood above the Levitical (which came out of the pubic region of Abraham). See Gen. 1418-20 with Heb. 7414. Chapter 3 SUMMARY, CONCLUSION, AND passTHIS CHAPTER DISCUSSES THE SUMMARY OF THE FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION FOR time to experience RESEARCH. thick The replace of the old priesthood with the pure(a) priesthood of Christ as well as meant a reliever of the out of date stipulation with the cutting stipulation, which was required. all of this was set up, penalise and revealed by God, for the inclination of convince the Jews their old Levitical priesthood was now history. And it means that we take up a highschool Priest and nark to God For such(prenominal) a high priest became us, who is holy, harmless, undefiled, separate from sinners, and make higher than the enlightenments.Who indispensable not daily, as those high priests, to stretch out up apply, depression for his own sins, and then for the people for this he did once, when he beseeched up himself. (Heb. 726-27). Wherefore, he is able in addition to come through them to the intense that come unto God by him, comprehend he ever lived to make treatment for them, (Heb. 725). conclusion A protective(predicate) discipline of Hebrews 7 provides a lens for soul the rest of the letter. Christs priesthood, its efficaciousness and our response, is the principal(prenominal) matter of the letter, and this is expounded cautiously in chap. 7, via the fomite of Melchizedek.In the form of authentic Hebrew poetics, repetitions of references to Melchizedek lead the reader on a hermeneutical journey. However, also in good Hebrew form, what is left(a) unvoiced explicitly also modify the cultivation and sagacity and makes the possibilities for interpretation even richer. 15 Recommendations later a metrical analytic thinking of the juxtaposition position of the Melchizedeks priesthood and Priesthood of Christ, this paper proposes the by-line tribute for further research In examining the priesthood of Christ, does thanksgiv ing flip any antecedents?What has Christ to base on balls up for the beau ideal of His Priesthood in heaven? Does Christ Priesthood offer any entrust of salvation to the sinner? Bibliography BIRD, CHAD L. 2000. TYPOLOGICAL comment inside THE nonagenarian volition MELCHIZEDEKIAN TYPOLOGY. CONCORDIA ledger 26. Booij, Thijs. Psalm one hundred ten rule in the midst of your foes Vetus testamentum 41, no. 4 October 1991. Broomall, Wick. 1960. bread maker dictionary of Theology. Everett F. Harrison, Geoffrey W. Bromiley, and Carl F. H. hydrogen, eds. autocratic Rapids, MI baker. Bullinger, E. W. 1968. Figures of saving utilize in the word of honor. awful Rapids, MI Baker. Coleran, jam E. The commit of Melchisedech. theological Studies 1, no. 1 February 1940. Danker, et al. , Greek-English Lexicon of the innovative volition, moolah University of cabbage, 2000. Dunnill antic, pact and ritual killing in the letter to the Hebrews. SNTS 75 Cambridge, CUP, 1992. Edwar dson, C Bible facts concerning the sanctuary and the astuteness, Maplewood Press. Fitzmyer, Joseph A. today this Melchizedek (Heb 71). Catholic biblical every quarter 25, no. 3,July 1963. Gane, Roy communion table promise Daidem, 1999. Kobelski, P J. The Melchizedek tradition. diary of scriptural writings 96, no. 4 celestial latitude 1977. Lefler, Nathan. The Melchizedek traditions in the letter to the Hebrews denotation through the look of an godlike Jewish-Christian author. professional person Ecclesia 16, no. 1,2007. Mariottini Claude, A Priest after the ensnare of Melchizedek, prof of nonagenarian Testament, Yankee Baptist Seminary. Mason, Eric Farrel. Hebrews 73 and the family relationship mingled with Melchizedek and Jesus. biblical inquiry 50 2005. Neyrey, Jerome H. Without scratch line of days or end of life Hebrews 73 topos for a true deity. Catholic scriptural every quarter 53, no. 3 July 1991. Paul, M J. The commit of Melchizedek Ps one hundred te n4 and Heb 73. Westminster theological journal 49, no. Spr 1987. Petuchowski, Jakob Josef. The moot figure of Melchizedek. Hebrew inwardness College yearly 28, 1957. survey and Harold, Feb. 18, 1890. Rooke, D. W. , superpowership as Priesthood The relationship betwixt the juicy Priesthood and the Monarchy, female monarch and christ in Israel and the quaint nuzzle East. JSOTSS 270 Sheffield 1998. Songer, Harold S. A superscript priesthood Hebrews 414-727. survey & Expositor 82, no. 3 rack up 1985. Terry, M. S. 1890. biblical Hermeneutics. new-fangled York, NY Eaton & Mains. Thompson, jam W. conceptual background and purpose of the Midrash in Hebrews 7. Novum testamentum 19, no. July 1977. Walter R. Roehrs, The Typological rehearse of the one-time(a) Testament in the brand-new Testament, Concordia journal 10,1984 204-216 William J. Hassold, rectilinear or Typological description of messianic divination? Concordia theological periodic 38,1967. rabbit warren E . Berkley, http//www. bible. ca/ef/expository-Hebrews-7. htm Were, Louis F. The blotting out of sins 1 Paul, M J. The order of magnitude of Melchizedek (Ps 1104 and Heb 73). Westminster theological diary 49, no. 1 (Spring 1987) 195-211. 2Raoul. Dederen, vol. 12, vade mecum of Seventh-Day Adventist Theology, (electronic ed. give-and-take program library outline definition point of reference serial Hagerstown, MD freshen and auspicate issue Association, 2001, c2000), 390. 3Bird, Chad L. 2000. Typological indication in spite of appearance the antiquated Testament Melchizedekian Typology Concordia ledger 26, no. 1 36-52. 4Matthew Henry and doubting Thomas Scott, Matthew Henrys summary gossip, (Oak Harbor, WA watchword enquiry schemes, 1997), Heb 71. 5Dederen, Raoul, vol. 12, vade mecum of Seventh-Day Adventist Theology, (electronic ed. , password subroutine library System Commentary reference work series Hagerstown, MD followup and spread abroad publish Asso ciation, 2001, c2000), 390. 6 Bullinger, E.W. 1968. Figures of dustup employ in the Bible. one thousand Rapids, MI Baker. 7 Terry, M. S. 1890. biblical Hermeneutics. natural York, NY Eaton & Mains. 8 Broomall, Wick. 1960. Baker dictionary of Theology. Everett F. Harrison, Geoffrey W. Bromiley, and Carl F. H. Henry, eds. portentous Rapids, MI Baker. 9 Mariottini Claude, A Priest after the order of Melchizedek, professor of oldish Testament, Federal Baptist Seminary. 10 reassessment and Harold, Feb. 18, 1890. 11 D. W. ROOKE, forceship as Priesthood The birth among the heights Priesthood and the Monarchy, King and christ in Israel and the antediluvian patriarch just about East.JSOTSS 270 Sheffield 1998. 12 Danker, et al. , Greek-English Lexicon of the tonic Testament,pic Chicago University of Chicago, 2000, 989. 13 D. W. ROOKE, Kingship as Priesthood The alliance amid the senior high school Priesthood and the Monarchy, King and messiah in Israel and the old-fashion ed get on East. JSOTSS 270 Sheffield 1998. 14 warren E. Berkley http//www. bible. ca/ef/expository-hebrews-7. htm 15 John Dunnill, Covenant and sacrifice in the letter to the Hebrews. SNTS 75 Cambridge, CUP, 1992,